tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30547433.post4303882696266504861..comments2022-03-24T23:57:06.256-04:00Comments on Bucky Bits: Do Java Web Application Frameworks *Really* Provide Too Much?Dave Newtonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13420113088393527059noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30547433.post-25088968126203011612008-11-30T08:11:00.000-05:002008-11-30T08:11:00.000-05:00If you had just stopped with the first paragraph.....If you had just stopped with the first paragraph... *sigh*Dave Newtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13420113088393527059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30547433.post-37415871468542737102008-11-30T04:33:00.000-05:002008-11-30T04:33:00.000-05:00There is no required configuration. And it's far ...There is no required configuration. And it's far from extensive! The configuration that is available is for overriding. It is also legacy code that is more than 4 years old. <BR/><BR/>Let me write about something I know nothing about and I'll be as good as you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30547433.post-41006097794513980872008-11-27T10:12:00.000-05:002008-11-27T10:12:00.000-05:00There are low-configuration options as well; there...There are low-configuration options as well; there's a direct URL->classpath mapping with no configuration (I think you still have to specify the view page in the request handler though), and there are other things like regex mappings and so on. Not a differentiating factor, since many other frameworks do the same thing, but it's not all XML. I didn't see any annotation-based Dave Newtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13420113088393527059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30547433.post-12274482375168798262008-11-27T09:51:00.000-05:002008-11-27T09:51:00.000-05:00Funny but this framework (jwebapp) seems to have p...Funny but this framework (jwebapp) seems to have pretty extensive "configuration".<BR/><BR/>Something like stripe or the click framework is far less configuration-heavy. My favourite is the click framework.Premhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08820240817738947292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30547433.post-66200149693458212902008-11-24T18:23:00.000-05:002008-11-24T18:23:00.000-05:00Wow... that's quite a long response.Its good. We n...Wow... that's quite a long response.<BR/><BR/>Its good. We need more open discussion if we want to get better. That's the point of open source, IMO.<BR/><BR/>If anybody can't handle it, they could make it closed source, commercialized, and get a marketing department. It usually ended up better to those people that way. (not to say anything bad about marketing department... haha)fadzlanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15534128508178684488noreply@blogger.com